• HOME
  • Maintenance & Technical


JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 2127

Maintenance & Technical

Maintenance & Technical (102)

Saturday, February 27 2016 18:03

Aging Gracefully: Addressing Corrosion

Written by

September 2015

In the March 2015 issue of Piper Flyer is a column authored by my hero Lyn Freeman about getting older. Of course I can’t speak for Lyn; only he can. And if he says he’s getting older, than he must be getting older.

As for myself, I’ve been flying 47 years and am on airplane number seven. I’m pretty sure that I’m not getting any older—but I know my airplane is.

As many of you know, I have been writing articles about the restoration of my Seneca II. Most of the major restoration was done over the course of the last decade and I’ve been getting the airplane ready to be painted for the last couple of years. That’s pretty much all that’s left to do before the restoration is complete… and then I’ll have to start over again!


Three projects at once
A year ago when it froze over in Wisconsin I couldn’t get my hangar door open for two months. The following summer I conspired with my A&P to do all of my work in January and February when I could keep my airplane in their heated hangar for two months.

Unfortunately this results in losing one month on my annual every year—the 13th month is free if your A&P signs off on your annual inspection on the first of a month—but the trade-off for being able to access my plane over the winter months is well worth it to me.

Last winter I was able to do three projects at once. First, I replaced my center stack of avionics, which I’ve written about in this magazine. (See “In with the New: An Avidyne IFD540 Plug-and-Play Conversion” in the June and July 2015 issues, “A New/Used Autopilot” in the April 2015 issue, and stay tuned for future articles. —Ed.)

Second, I was able to complete the installation of auxiliary fuel tanks that I bought used about five years ago and never installed. (Be on the lookout for this story in a future issue of Piper Flyer, too. —Ed.)

Third, I had my annual inspection about two months early. I hadn’t intended on doing my inspection two months early, but my lead mechanic Erich—whose advice and judgment I covet every time I am in his presence—recommended that I do so while I was installing my auxiliary fuel tanks.

As he said, “Why take apart and reassemble the airplane twice? Save yourself some money, Scott!”
Point—and advice—taken.

The good news from the annual was that my airplane is mostly in excellent shape. The bad news was that I had two small areas that showed some corrosion that needed to be addressed. Right now.


That scary “c” word
Hearing the word “corrosion” from your A&P could be likened to hearing the word “cancer” from your physician; they’re both scary.

With all of the restoration projects over the last 10 years, I consider myself fortunate that corrosion was really the only thing that needed addressing in early 2015. I got the plane in questionable condition in 2004, but it was as close to free as any 3,000-hour twin could be.

At that time I gutted the interior and addressed a little bit of corrosion around and under the windows. I overhauled the engines, so everything firewall-forward and behind was addressed. I replaced all of the glass so that there were no leaks going forward, and the landing gear was overhauled and treated.

Most importantly, my technicians sprayed ACF-50 into the wings to arrest any corrosion that may have been there. While ACF-50 weeped from the wings for several years and was quite annoying, it certainly was the right thing to do. I highly recommend this treatment for any aging airplane.


AC 43-4A
My other mechanic, Nathan, showed me a publication on corrosion from the FAA. I promptly went home and downloaded Advisory Circular 43-4A, “Corrosion Control for Aircraft,” from the FAA website.
I wholeheartedly recommend that every airplane owner and pilot read this publication. It’s free, contains a complete description on airframe corrosion, and details the many types that can potentially be found on an airplane.

I was surprised to discover there are seven forms of corrosion that occur on airframes. Seven! As depressing as that sounds, I took comfort in the fact that my airplane only had two small areas containing two forms of corrosion.

Without further ado, here are the seven types:
A. Uniform Etch Corrosion
B. Pitting Corrosion
C. Galvanic Corrosion
D. Concentration Cell Corrosion
E. Intergranular Corrosion
F. Exfoliation Corrosion
G. Filiform Corrosion

Rather than try and quote the FAA publication’s description each type, I recommend you download the document and look on page 14. (See Resources for a link to the PDF through PiperFlyer.org. —Ed.) The descriptions are accompanied by photographs, and the document also includes details on how to remove and repair corrosion.


Picture 01

Trouble spot number one
The first place that corrosion was found on my aircraft was on the vertical stabilizer between the stabilizer and the rudder. (See picture 1) Once the rudder was removed, Nathan removed the rudder attach hinges—and lo and behold, underneath the hinges was pitting corrosion. Picture 2 gives you a closeup of one of two of these areas.

Picture 2

Picture 03

 Picture 04

At first glance you see that it is shiny and clean. Well, it is shiny and clean, as Nathan had cleaned it up, but you’ll notice that above the large hole is a round area that looks slightly bumpy and not as shiny as the other cleaned-up area.

I thought that Nathan would just clean this area, too—perhaps treat it with an anti-corrosion treatment, like chromate primer—put the hinge back on, reattach the rudder and move on to the next project. Unfortunately it never seems to work out that way.

Instead, Nathan used a caliper to measure the thickness of the good area versus the area with the pitting corrosion. What he discovered was that more than 10 percent of the thickness of the aluminum plate had been eroded. Nathan explained to me that it was not a safe practice to just treat the area and reassemble it when more than 10 percent of the aluminum was gone.

Of course, I’m thinking dollars and Nathan is thinking safety. I’m also thinking I can impress him with my 47 years of airplane ownership and give him the answer. Feeling quite proud of myself, I said,

“Throw on a doubler!”

Nathan slowly shook his head no. To safely address this corrosion, we had to order a new plate, drill out all of the rivets, prime, paint and install the new plate and only then could we put the rudder back. Well, it’s only money, I thought. I told him to proceed.

Picture 6 is the new rudder vertical spar after replacement. Nice and green and new. And safe! Picture 7 is a closeup of that spar.


Trouble spot number two
A couple of days later I was back to see the progress on my plane when I got called over to the cabin area. My mechanic had been searching the entire plane for corrosion and not to be denied, he found some. He had removed the back two seats and the carpeting underneath them to check on the control cables and pulleys.

If you look at picture 3 you’ll see a steel angle bracket riveted to two pieces of aluminum. Even after you ignore the green chromate and the glue (that was holding some insulation and carpet down), it’s obvious that the steel plate has a significant amount of rust. Six inches away is another bracket holding another two pieces of aluminum together and that bracket is very rusted, too.
I figured that Nathan would clean it up with an abrasive cleaning pad, re-chromate it, and move on. Instead, Nathan drilled out the rivets and removed both brackets. You can see what he found on Picture 4.

Picture 05

You’ll see on Picture 5 that underneath the brackets the aluminum had turned to dust. Nathan caught this issue in time to prevent the deterioration from spreading to other areas. All we had to do was to order new brackets and the appropriate aluminum parts. And of course, pay for it. (Oh well, it’s just money! I didn’t want to leave any to my kids anyway!)

As for the interior, apparently a water leak occurred a long time ago. That water had pooled under the rear seat and started the corrosion—which had festered for at least a decade—and was missed by all of my prior mechanics.

 Picture 06

Picture 07

No shortcuts—this is structural
Pictures 8, 9 and 10 show corroded parts after they were removed from the airplane. I urge you to have your mechanic dig very deeply into your plane when he or she is doing the next annual. No shortcuts to save a few bucks. Picture 11 shows the area cleaned up with the old parts removed.
When I next visited the heated hangar, I found two signs on my airplane. One was taped near the front door and the other was by rear door.

Picture 08

Picture 09

Picture 10

I asked my corrosion expert, John, about them. He said, “Scott, the parts removed were structural. If someone gets in the plane while these parts are removed, you could bend the fuselage.”
You can add up 2+2 yourself. The corroded parts were structural. Unfortunately all of this corrosion is costing me a couple of months in the shop and some money. But it could have progressed to something unthinkable that would have cost me and my family much more. I don’t even want to go there.

Picture 11 

Picture 12

Remedies and ruminations
Looking at Picture 12, you can see several things. First, you’ll see that the entire floor was cleaned and coated with two coats of primer. John had removed many more aluminum pieces from the area, inspected, cleaned, primed and reinstalled them.

Second, you can also see the two new aluminum spars and steel brackets are installed.
Third, this photo shows you the floor. I mean, the real floor—the only piece of metal between me and a great view of the ground below. There isn’t a second layer anywhere to be found. (Structural integrity becomes even more incontestable when you think about it in these terms.)

Fourth, there are actually several tiny drain holes in the aluminum skin. Any pooled water in this area should drain out, but obviously it didn’t. Why? The carpet throughout the airplane had been glued down with adhesive.

None of the mechanics assigned to the aircraft in the previous 10 years were able to inspect the area without damaging the carpeting, so they didn’t. My mechanic was troubled by this fact.

As I had personally installed the plane’s Airtex upholstery kit, I began to wonder if I didn’t do it correctly. Airtex offers high quality, custom kits that you can install yourself to save on labor costs, and that’s just what I did. (Longtime Piper Flyer Association supporter SCS Interiors offers pre-cut carpet and vinyl floor kits as well. See Resources for the link. —Ed.)

Unfortunately, my Airtex kit didn’t come with any instructions whatsoever. The company’s customer support is excellent; they will answer any installation question you may have. However, nowhere that I found does it say not to install the carpeting with adhesive.

In my case, it was a matter of “you don’t know what you don’t know”—and I didn’t know to ask! I’ve now done four airplanes with Airtex interiors and had glued all of the carpeting down. So what are other people doing?

I asked my mechanic, and he showed me the interior of a twin turboprop. He recommended that next time I do what the expensive business aircraft do: use a fabric fastener (i.e., Velcro) or snaps. That way a mechanic can remove and reinstall carpeting in just a few moments; any water will find its way to the drain holes, and mechanics (and owners) can check for corrosion themselves at any time. Epiphany! Thanks, John.

I’ve ordered new carpeting from Airtex for the backseat of my airplane and it will be here this week. I should be able to get my plane back together and get back in the air next week.

Next winter when I’ve got nothing to do, I’ll order replacement carpeting for the remainder of the airplane, tear up the old stuff and reinstall with snaps and Velcro.


Grateful to have the best
At the end of the day, this was the extent of the corrosion damage on my airplane. With a couple of down months and a few dollars comes peace of mind. I have a safe, reliable airplane that’s aging gracefully and safely.

It pays to have a quality team taking care of your airplane, and I feel like I have the best. I hope you do, too.

If you have questions about your airplane or feel like your mechanic isn’t digging deep enough during inspection, it’s time for the two of you to have a serious talk. You have an expectation of quality and safety in your flying machine, and if you’re concerned about something, don’t ignore it. It’s your life!
Piper Flyer Association member Scott Sherer is a multi-engine and instrument rated private pilot. He’s logged over 2,600 hours and is the owner of a 1977 PA-34-200T based at Burlington Municipal (KBUU) in Burlington, Wis. Sherer anxiously awaits the day when N344TB finally gets new paint. Send questions or comments to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

September 2015

Q: Hi Steve,

The electric fuel pump in my Piper PA-24-180 started oozing yellow goop out of the place where the electrical lead enters the body of the pump.

I started looking around for one and was told the Piper list price for one of these (Part No. 481 666) is $630.60. Somebody has got to be kidding! This pump looks exactly like a clicker-type electric fuel pump that I can buy at the local auto parts store for less than $50.

When I asked my mechanic is I could put one of the auto parts store’s pumps on my Comanche, he told me that he had to have paperwork to legally install it.

Is there anything I can do to get the price down where it’s reasonable?

—Fuel-less Fred


A: Dear Fred,

Many an aircraft owner has asked the same thing—and I’d suspect that there is more than one facet fuel pump from an auto parts store installed on a certified airplane like yours—but it’s not legal to do so.

Fortunately there is a solution to reduce the cost of one of these pumps and still comply with the regulations. It won’t get the price down to auto parts store prices, but it will cut it almost in half.

McFarlane Aviation in Baldwin City, Kan. sells replacement electric fuel pumps that are approved for installation on your airplane by STC. The cost of the replacement pump (Part No. CA35328-800E) is $245—and that includes free shipping.

You will have to go to the McFarlane website to download the STC paperwork and the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) that are needed to complete the installation.

These pumps have a one-year warranty from McFarlane.

I guess you can be grateful you don’t fly a later PA-24-250; it has two of these pumps.

Happy flying.


Know your FAR/AIM and check with your mechanic before starting any work.

Steve Ells has been an A&P/IA for 43 years and is a commercial pilot with instrument and multi-engine ratings. Ells also loves utility and bush-style airplanes and operations. He’s a former tech rep and editor for Cessna Pilots Association and served as associate editor for AOPA Pilot until 2008. Ells is the owner of Ells Aviation (EllsAviation.com) and the proud owner of a 1960 Piper Comanche. He lives in Templeton, Calif. with his wife Audrey. Send questions and comments to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

September 2015

Q: Hi Steve,

I’m a 56-year-old man. I had a good job and retired a couple of years ago. I was approached by a fella at my local airport who wanted to sell me his Piper PA-22 Tri-Pacer.

I didn’t know much about Tri-Pacers so I asked my flight instructor what he thought, and I got a mechanic to check it out.

My instructor described the Tri-Pacer as a good, if somewhat unusual airplane. He said it performs as well as a Cessna 172 and sells for a lot less.

Well, I bought it and have been flying it around Oklahoma and Texas for the last six months.

Now I’m considering a flight from my home in Oklahoma to southern Oregon next month. I’ve been taking my PA-22 to a local airport on hot days (90 degrees F or hotter) with a real long runway and making takeoffs with 60 and 70 percent power to get a feel for the loss of performance I’ll experience when flying in the mountains. It’s pretty dramatic.

I’ve read lots of magazine articles with lists such as “Top 10 Mountain Flying Tips,” and “Density Altitude for Dummies,” so I have a pretty good idea about how altitude and temperature will affect my flight.

My plan is to fly early in the day and give myself plenty of time.

My question, though, is about oxygen. Do you think I should get a small portable oxygen setup?
—Tri-Pacer Tom


A; Dear Tom,

The Tri-Pacer won’t quite provide the same performance (or carry as much, or go as far when the fuel tanks are full) as pre-1967 Cessna 172s, but it’s not far behind. But a PA-22 is much less expensive.

 There’s no denying Tri-Pacers are quirky: manual flaps; smallish fuel capacity (36 gallons); typical Piper overhead trim handle; bungee-cushioned main landing gear; a brake handle that applies braking to both mains simultaneously; and last but not least, a master switch that’s located under the pilot’s seat.

In spite of these quirks, most Tri-Pacer owners smile smugly when they hear others bad-mouth their airplanes.

If you take what’s called the Southern Route from Oklahoma (El Paso, Tex.– Phoenix–Twentynine Palms, Calif.–Apple Valley, Calif.–Palmdale, Calif.) into the California Central Valley, you’ll never have to fly higher than 7,500 feet.

I recommend that most pilots keep a small oxygen setup in their airplane just to be on the safe side. This is especially true if you aren’t physically active or are over age 50.

It will never hurt to take a few hits of oxygen if you spend more than a couple of hours flying above 6,000 to 7000 feet MSL or if you are flying at night. The restorative effects of oxygen will amaze you.

 It’s a rule of thumb that blood oxygen levels should be kept above 90 percent during day flights and above 95 percent during night flights.

The only way to measure your blood saturation levels is by using a pulse oximeter. All you do is stick the end of one finger in an oximeter, and in a few seconds the unit displays your percent of blood oxygen saturation and pulse rate. Good units are available at many pilot supply stores.

Piper Flyer Association supporter MH Oxygen Systems provides a wide range of supplemental oxygen systems. One of the simplest is its Co-pilot System. This $215 system consists of three non-refillable bottles full of oxygen, a mask and a regulator that is adjusted to deliver flow rates of 33 percent, 66 percent and 100 percent.

At first glance it’s hard to imagine that these small bottles (they are approximately the size of a can of shaving gel) are capable of providing much protection—especially after reading on the MH website that one bottle provides a 100 percent oxygen flow (two liters/minute at sea level) for only nine to 10 minutes.

However, according to MH most users choose to extend the useful oxygen delivery time by taking regular “hits” of oxygen. One example cited was taking three breaths during a 10-second period every 15 minutes at the 100 percent setting. (The regulator is turned off between hits.) At this rate, the bottle/mask combination will last 12 hours.

The advantages of the Co-pilot include portability, light weight and affordability. And once you have the system, replacement bottles only cost $25. The duration can be extended substantially by using a $29 Oxymizer nasal cannula instead of the mask. Another advantage is that the bottles never have to be re-tested in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations.

Larger kits from MH Oxygen Systems can be categorized as constant flow or pulsed flow systems. All constant flow systems include a storage bottle in a wide range of capacities, a regulator with up to six stations, and an adjustable flow meter and a normal cannula for each station. Each system is housed in a tough carry bag that’s fitted with straps and buckles intended to secure it to the back of the copilot’s seat.

Portable pulsed demand systems use MH Electronic Delivery System (EDS) O2 D1 or O2 D2 modules to monitor the users’ breathing cycles to deliver oxygen at the most beneficial period in each inhalation cycle.

According to MH, this innovation increases available oxygen per fill by up to 30 percent over constant flow systems. This means that the bottle size and weight needed is much smaller than the bottles used with constant flow systems to deliver the same blood oxygen saturation levels.

To put this in some kind of perspective, an individual pilot tapping oxygen from an AL-113—the smallest bottle MH sells—would be get 1.6 hours of oxygen when using what MH calls its MH4 adjustable flow meter and a normal cannula. He would get 4.7 hours of oxygen when using a MH3 flowmeter and an Oxymizer cannula and 6.9 hours of oxygen when equipped with an EDS O2D1 and an Oxymizer cannula.

I think I would start with the purchase of a pulse oximeter. If your saturation level goes below 90 percent at 7,000 feet MSL, I’d get the supplemental oxygen system and equipment that best fits your needs.

Happy flying.


Know your FAR/AIM and check with your mechanic before starting any work.

Steve Ells has been an A&P/IA for 43 years and is a commercial pilot with instrument and multi-engine ratings. Ells also loves utility and bush-style airplanes and operations. He’s a former tech rep and editor for Cessna Pilots Association and served as associate editor for AOPA Pilot until 2008. Ells is the owner of Ells Aviation (EllsAviation.com) and the proud owner of a 1960 Piper Comanche. He lives in Templeton, Calif. with his wife Audrey. Send questions and comments to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Saturday, May 30 2015 19:21

Restoration Rules of Thumb

Written by

Have a DIY project in mind? Read these eight simple tips before you start.

June 2015-

As pilots, we have a responsibility to know our aircraft as well as we can, and one great way to learn about our airplanes is to complete a restoration project. Things like replacing bulbs, installing new seatbelts and new seats, repairing upholstery and decorative furnishings; as well as simple repairs and adjustments—and many other service actions which don’t involve disassembly of the primary structure—are all permitted under the preventive maintenance section of FAR part 43, Appendix A. (We’ve recently added a link to the U.S. Government Publishing Office on PiperFlyer.org. Look for “Browse e-CFR Data” under the Knowledge Base tab. There you can review FAR part 43, Appendix A and other regulations. —Ed.)

Here are some general tips to keep in mind if you’re contemplating a DIY project.

01 Define the scope of your project, and be realistic about your restoration skills and budget.

If this is your first restoration project, you’ll want to keep your project small and inexpensive.
When you’re planning, keep in mind that if you run into trouble you could have your plane down for weeks (or longer) while you get help. Talk to your A&P before you start any work, and if you have difficulty after you begin your project, get your mechanic’s advice. You can also reach out to your fellow members through the PFA forums by logging in to PiperFlyer.org.

June 2015-

Q: Dear Steve,
I fly a Seneca II and so far it’s been a very dependable airplane. But I’m seeing something that I haven’t seen before and wonder if you can give me some information to understand what’s happening.

One of my crew told me that he has seen some blue smoke coming out of the exhaust of the right engine when I first start up. When I asked him to tell me about it, he said the blue smoke was visible for about 10 seconds, then it disappeared. (He didn’t see any blue smoke when I started the left engine.)

He’s been working for me for five years, and is almost always the guy that takes me to the airplane when I have to fly to one of our remote locations. He’s a smart guy, and when he told me that he didn’t remember ever seeing the blue smoke before, I thought I better get some help.

—Seneca Sam

A: Dear Sam,
It sounds like oil is leaking into the hot side of your turbocharger and then being burnt as the turbocharger heats up after starting the engine.
On the outside, aircraft turbochargers look like nothing more than two scroll-like housings joined to a steel center section. There’s a scroll-like housing on the turbine (the exhaust, or “hot”) side of the assembly; and a scroll-like housing on the compressor (the air inlet, or “cold” side) of the assembly.

The turbine wheel and the compressor wheel are mounted on a common shaft that is supported by bearings in the cast-iron center section. The shaft is cooled and lubricated by pressure oil pumped from the engine. Labyrinth seals prevent the lubricating oil from leaking out of the center section.

The turbocharging system that’s installed in your Seneca II is what’s known as pressure relief valve control system. This type of system is used on Seneca IIs, Seneca IIIs and turbocharged versions of the Arrow and Dakota.
This simple system routes all the exhaust gas pressure developed by the engine to two parallel paths: the first path goes to the exhaust turbine, the second path is a bypass path. A restriction in the bypass path is adjusted on the ground by mechanics to produce the proper full throttle critical altitude. This restriction is a fixed wastegate used to control the turbine rpm.

In the case of your Seneca, a properly adjusted system should be capable of producing 39.5 to 40 inches of manifold pressure (at 2,575 rpm and full rich mixture) up to an altitude between 11,500 and 12,500 feet MSL.
This type of turbocharger system is extremely simple but requires constant pilot attention since any throttle movement directly affects boost, and because the inlet air to the engine is always warmed by passage through the turbocharger.
Finally, although the turbocharger itself has the capacity to provide additional boost above the critical altitude, this boost can’t be utilized since the wastegate can’t be adjusted during flight to “get” that boost.

Fortunately, Merlyn Products of Spokane, Wash. has developed Merlyn Black Magic, a wastegate control system that lowers engine temperatures, greatly increases the critical altitude and relieves the angst that revolves around the possibility of overboosting the engine due to accidental or inadvertent throttle mismanagement.
A couple of things can cause smoke upon startup. The easiest (and therefore, the first) thing to check is bearing wear. You can do this by removing the ducting from the inlet-air side of the turbocharger and trying to manually move the shaft.

The shaft must rotate smoothly, but there shouldn’t be any in-and-out or up-and-down movement. Spin the shaft; feel for ease of rotation and wear. Listen for any rubbing sounds.
If the shaft drags, it’s a sign of heavy coking or sludge in the oil cavity. This may have been caused by not changing the oil often enough; not delaying engine shutdown until the turbocharger has cooled down; or a restriction in the oil delivery line. Restricted oil flow will cause overheating in the center section.

While you have the inlet air ducting off, take a good look in the scroll for oil. There shouldn’t be any on the cold side. While you’re at it, get a mirror and a flashlight and inspect the turbine (hot) side for evidence of burned oil.

A weak oil scavenge pump can also cause smoking and leaking check valves in the oil delivery and oil return lines. When the engine isn’t running, these check valves close to prevent oil from flowing under gravity to the center section. If one of these valves isn’t seating fully, oil will creep past the shaft labyrinth seals.
Three Piper Flyer Association supporters—Approved Turbo Components (ATC) Hartzell Engine Technologies (HET) and Main Turbo Inc.—all offer great information about turbocharger systems and troubleshooting on their company websites. (See Resources for the URLs. —Ed.)

ATC’s Knowledge Center includes FAQs, troubleshooting, torque tables and more available as downloadable PDFs.
HET’s Troubleshooting page is in a Q&A format and can give you important details with just a few clicks. Service Information (Service Bulletins, ADs, Service Letters) are also accessible.
Main Turbo’s troubleshooting information is organized by symptom, offering possible causes of trouble and actions for each. The company also offers a maintenance tips newsletter by email subscription.

Happy flying.

Q: Hi Steve,
I too fly a Seneca II, and am probably okay since summer is finally here, but I need a new windshield ice plate. My five-year-old dropped it when I wasn’t looking and the glass shattered.
I install the shield as soon as the snow starts to fly in the fall and leave it on until spring. I don’t often have to turn it on, but since I fly all around the Northeast and sometimes into Chicago and Cleveland, I have to be ready for an ice encounter.

What are the options for getting this one repaired? I’ve heard that new ones are hideously expensive. If I have to bite the new-part bullet, I will—but I’d like to know if there are other options.
I also need some guidance on how many times I can patch my wing boots. Every few years we find another hole or two. I know I have to budget for de-icing boot replacement—but I want to know the repair limits, just so I can gauge if it’ll be sooner, or later. Can you help me?

—Busted Bob
A: Dear Bob,
It’s too bad your son dropped the plate. You have a couple of options.
The Piper part number for your plate is 78148-00. I checked with a Piper parts dealer and these plates are available, but the dealer told me she would have to check with Piper for a lead time. One online site cited a six- to nine-month delivery delay. List price is $5,501.
PFA supporter B/E Aerospace sells windshields for Piper Saratogas, but in talking with Joe Evans, marketing specialist at B/E, if you or any Seneca owners need help securing a replacement plate before winter, the company would be happy to help.

Evans mentioned that you can also get a quote from one of B/E’s installation centers. The link is in Resources at the end of this article.
I found plenty of used plates by typing that part number into an internet search engine, and the majority of the ones I found were listed as “used-serviceable.” Most used parts houses provide a short-term return-if-not-satisfied window; I’d ask before sending your money.
As far as boot replacement, B/E Aerospace has a pneumatic de-icer maintenance manual that provides guidance on evaluating boot condition. (See Resources for the link. —Ed.)

The tests for condition include a time-to-inflate test, a leak test and a time-to-deflate test. Any variation from prescribed times (six seconds to full inflation at regulated pressure; no more than 3 psi pressure loss after 60 seconds with inlet pressure sealed, and no more than 22 seconds to leak down (no vacuum)) indicates a less-than-healthy boot.

The following is from the B/E manual regarding total patch areas:
Recommended limits for application of patches for maximum operating efficiency of a pneumatic de-icer.
Three (3) small patches (1 ¼” x 2 ½”) per any 12-inch square area.
Two (2) medium patches (2 ½” x 5”)
per any 12-inch square area.
One (1) large patch (5” x 10”) per any 12-inch square area.

Additional information about evaluating your boots is listed on the
“10 Reasons to Replace Your Wing Boots” published on the Ice Shield website.
This information should provide some guidance for determining the state of your de-icing boots.

Happy flying.

Know your FAR/AIM and check with your mechanic before starting any work.

Steve Ells has been an A&P/IA for 43 years and is a commercial pilot with instrument and multi-engine ratings. He’s a former tech rep and editor for Cessna Pilots Association and served as associate editor for AOPA Pilot until 2008. Ells is the owner of Ells Aviation (EllsAviation.com) and the proud owner of a 1960
Piper Comanche. Send questions and
comments to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..


Turbo systems and service
– PFA supporters
Approved Turbo Components, Inc.

Hartzell Engine Technologies

Main Turbo Systems, Inc.

Wastegate control system
Merlyn Products, Inc.

B/E Aerospace, Inc. – PFA supporter
Ice Shield installers

Ice Shield Pneumatic De-Icer,
B/E Report #97-33-047

“10 Reasons to Replace
Your Wing Boots”

May 2015-
Q: Hi Steve,
I watched a gear-up landing at my local airport a week ago. Nobody in the Piper Arrow was hurt, so it was a good landing. But after all the facts were known, it appears as if the cause was the pilot didn’t know how to, or got emotionally seized up, when he attempted to do an emergency gear extension.

As I pondered this I wondered if I would be able to get the gear down in my Arrow II if something went wrong. I’ve read the book on the emergency gear-down procedure, but I’ve never actually done it.
I decided to survey the other pilots here that fly retractable landing gear airplanes and found that only one or two out of 14 had ever completed an emergency gear-down procedure while flying.

I know I can re-read through the manual, and sit in the cockpit and coach myself through the steps when I’m on the ground. I believe I understand the landing gear system, but wonder if I should insist that my instructor let me perform an actual emergency gear extension.
What do you think?

—Landing Gear Gary

A: Dear Gary,
I’m impressed with the fact you’re striving to learn all you can about the landing gear system in your Arrow II. An intimate knowledge of systems increases confidence and makes flying safer.

The landing gear (LG) system in your PA-28R-200 is pretty simple. During the gear-up cycle, the LG is retracted using hydraulic pressure generated by a pump/reservoir/valve assembly located aft of the baggage compartment on the pilot’s side of the centerline.

Once the gear is up and the actuating cylinders have reached the limit of up travel, the hydraulic pressure builds to approximately 1,400 psi. At that point a pressure sensing switch turns off the pump. A one-way check valve seals the up pressure line and the LG legs are held up by the captured hydraulic fluid.

If there’s a small leak past the check valve or past a piston in one of the actuators, pressure will bleed off. At approximately 1,100 psi the pressure sensing switch will turn the pump motor back on until the pressure again builds to approximately 1,400 psi.
An emergency landing gear extension is quite simple: pushing the emergency gear extension lever on the pilot’s side of the console between the front seats opens up the gear-up fluid lines.
Without pressure, the gear will fall out of the gear wells and lock itself down. Built-in restrictions, called snubbers, in the fluid lines prevent the LG from slamming down into position. Extension of the nosegear is assisted by springs.

As you know, there is an in-flight emergency gear-down test procedure in the service manual of your Arrow. Get together with your flight instructor, review the procedures and then go out and practice.
Gaining this kind of experience with the steps involved in extending the LG in an emergency will go a long way in easing your concerns.

Happy flying.

Q: Hi Steve,
Our 1967 Arrow will experience very rough—but quite intermittent—engine operation in very cold weather. I’ve noticed this hiccup occurs shortly after departure and also on taxiing after landing. The coughing eventually stops, but it is somewhat unnerving, especially on departure.

The engine-driven fuel pump was replaced in 2014 and seemed to resolve the problem. However, the quirkiness reared its ugly head again last winter. The airplane is kept in a heated hangar, and temperatures during flight are ranging from 20 degrees to -20 degrees F.
Speculation suggests that frost on plugs and/or injectors turns to water and gets ingested into the fuel, or a possible air intake blockage.

Additional information:
1) The phenomenon only occurs in cold weather, and did not occur before we had a heated hangar.
2) The coughing primarily occurs when the Arrow is in a nose-up pitch attitude. Is a vent getting blocked?
3) There is a delay of at least 30 to 60 minutes after leaving the hangar before it happens. Evidently the issue is dependent on outside temperature? When it occurred for the first time last winter, it took about 45 minutes and we were departing Duluth, Minn. (KDLH), nose up.
Perhaps water is condensing because of temperature decrease from hangar to outside, somewhere in the fuel system—probably on the right side—and then freezing, creating ice crystals and causing a partial restriction of fuel flow?
Any suggestions would be most welcome!

—Arrow Angst

A: Dear Arrow,
It sounds like you’re getting little bits of water in the fuel. Not enough to cause a real emergency or loss of power, but enough to cause a tighter grip on the yoke.
The most common causes are a leaky fuel cap or condensation. Since you’re moving your airplane from a heated hangar I’d bet that your problems are condensation-based.

Try to shake the wings by putting one hand on top of the wing and one hand on the bottom of the wing at the wing spar, and do your best to move the wing up and down. The idea is to dislodge any water globules and get them flowing to the fuel sump drain.
Then drain a lot of fuel—at least a quart—out of the right tank. (Might as well do the left tank, too, since you’ll be warmed up!) Keep draining until you no longer see any evidence of water.

The next thing to do is add isopropyl alcohol to the fuel tank. The alcohol absorbs water and prevents water in the fuel from freezing. Don’t use rubbing alcohol even though it does contain isopropyl alcohol; it’s diluted.
I’ve included a fuel additive chart for you to refer to (page 23). One example adds five cups of alcohol to 30 gallons of fuel. If you’re having a hard time rounding up isopropyl alcohol, you can order Prist Hi-Flash Lo-Flo anti-icing fuel additive from Aircraft Spruce and Specialty.

After pondering your write-up, it appears that in addition to the water from condensation you have an idle mixture problem. It’s important to reset the idle mixture and idle speed with seasonal changes. If that wasn’t done it may explain the spark plug fouling and hard starting problems.
A simple test to determine if the idle mixture is set correctly is to slowly pull the mixture control knob aft at idle rpm after a flight. (It’s important that the engine is at operating temperature for this test.) Some maintenance texts suggest doing this test at 600 rpm; some at 1,000 rpm.

A properly set idle mixture will cause a slight (25 to 50 rpm) rise prior to engine cutoff. If you have an analog tachometer it may not show this slight change, but you’ll be able to hear the rise if it’s there.
If the increase is greater than 50 rpm, the mixture is set too rich; if there’s no rise, the mixture is too lean.
Please let me know if these tips work.

Happy flying.

Know your FAR/AIM and check with your mechanic before starting any work.

Steve Ells has been an A&P/IA for 43 years and is a commercial pilot with instrument and multi-engine ratings. Ells also loves utility and bush-style airplanes and operations. He’s a former tech rep and editor for Cessna Pilots Association and served as associate editor for AOPA Pilot until 2008. Ells is the owner of Ells Aviation (EllsAviation.com) and the proud owner of a 1960 Piper Comanche. He lives in Paso Robles, Calif. with his wife Audrey. Send questions and
comments to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..


Prist Hi-Flash Lo-Flo
Anti-Icing Fuel Additive

Friday, April 10 2015 20:42

Piper Mandatory Service Bulletin 1245A

Written by

Existing Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (i.e., the appropriate Piper Maintenance Manual and associated Service Publications) include an inspection of all flight control pulleys, cables, fittings and turnbuckles on a recurring basis. However, service history suggests that over time, the turnbuckles used in the stabilator flight control cable system may develop cracks or corrosion which may not be detected during these inspections. This Service Bulletin provides specific instructions for the recurring inspection of the stabilator flight control system.

Click the link below to download PDF

Friday, April 10 2015 20:39

AD 2013-02-13

Written by

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. (type certificate previously held by The New Piper Aircraft Inc.) PA-28, PA-32, PA-34, and PA-44 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of control cable assembly failures that may lead to failure of the horizontal stabilator control system and could result in loss of pitch control. This AD requires inspections of the stabilator control system and replacement of parts as necessary. We are
issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

Click the link below to download PDF

Tuesday, March 31 2015 21:34

Aircraft Sales Agreement Sample Forms

Written by

The following is a sample aircraft sales agreement form available in PDF or Microsoft Word formats.

Click the links below to download.

Tuesday, March 31 2015 21:28

Title Search Companies and Law Firms

Written by

The following is a list of title search companies and law firms.

Click the link below to download PDF.

Page 1 of 8